Plural Subject Theory and the Common Good: A Human Rights Critique in Dialogue with Islamic Political Thought
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58524/jiccr.v2i1.93Keywords:
Common Good, Collective Agency, Human Rights, Islamic Political Philosophy, , Plural Subject TheoryAbstract
This paper critically examines Margaret Gilbert's plural subject theory through the objective of human rights and the concept of the common good. Gilbert's plural subject theory offers a thrilling account of collective agency grounded in joint commitment, explaining how individuals form unified agents capable of coordinated action and shared responsibility. However, despite its analytical strength, the theory remains normatively limited in addressing the moral status of non-members and the principle of universal human equality. This study adopts a conceptual and normative philosophical methodology to develop a human rights-based critique of plural subject theory. It argues that while joint commitments smooth social cohesion and collective identity. They may also create exclusionary and oppressive outcomes when not in line with universal ethical principles. To address these limitations, the paper incorporates insights from Islamic political philosophy, particularly the concepts of maslahah (public welfare), adl (justice), shura (consultation), and ummah (community), to construct a more comprehensive and ethically grounded conception of the common good. By joining the plural subject theory with human rights and cross-civilizational ethical contexts, the study proposes a revised normative model of collective agency in which human rights are understood as collectively recognised moral obligations. This model provides a more comprehensive account of collective action united with universal human dignity and offers a stronger foundation for evaluating political, social, and institutional arrangements.
Downloads
References
Al-Qaradawi, Y. (2001). Fi fiqh al-awlawiyyat. Maktabat Wahbah.
An-Na'im, A. A. (2008). Islam and the secular state: Negotiating the future of Shari'a. Harvard University Press.
Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid al-Shariah as philosophy of Islamic law: A systems approach.
International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Benhabib, S. (2004). The rights of others: Aliens, residents, and citizens. Cambridge University Press.
Beitz, C. R. (2009). The idea of human rights. Oxford University Press.
Bratman, M. (2014). Shared agency: A planning theory of acting together. Oxford University Press.
Bratman, M. (2020). Shared intentionality. Ethics, 130(2), 241–269. https://doi.org/10.1086/706140
Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton University Press.
Donnelly, J. (2013). Universal human rights in theory and practice (3rd ed.). Cornell University Press.
Donnelly, J., & Whelan, D. J. (2020). International human rights (5th ed.). Routledge. Gilbert, M. (1989). On social facts. Princeton University Press.
Gilbert, M. (2000). Sociality and responsibility: New essays in plural subject theory. Rowman & Littlefield.
Gilbert, M. (2006). A theory of political obligation: Membership, commitment, and the bonds of society. Oxford University Press.
Gilbert, M. (2013). Joint commitment: How we make the social world. Oxford University Press.
Gould, C. C. (2019). Globalizing democracy and human rights (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. MIT Press.
Kamali, M. H. (2008). Shari'ah law: An introduction. Oneworld Publications.
List, C. (2019). What is it like to be a group agent? Noûs, 53(2), 295–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12227
List, C., & Pettit, P. (2011). Group agency: The possibility, design, and status of corporate agents. Oxford University Press.
MacIntyre, A. (1984). After virtue (2nd ed.). University of Notre Dame Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (rev. ed.). Harvard University Press.
Reicher, S., & Haslam, S. A. (2006). Rethinking the psychology of tyranny. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466605X80714
Schmid, H. B. (2018). Plural action. Philosophy Compass, 13(1), e12488. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12488
Schmid, H. B. (2020). Collective intentionality and group rights. Journal of Social Philosophy, 51(2), 189–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12327
Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. Free Press.
Tuomela, R. (2007). The philosophy of sociality: The shared point of view. Oxford University Press.
Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sidra Tariq (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
