Teachers’ Perceptions of AI Tools for Enhancing Student Motivation and Learning Engagement in Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58524/aidie.v1i1.53Keywords:
artificial intelligence, teacher perceptions, student motivation, learning engagement, higher educationAbstract
This study examined higher education teachers’ perceptions of AI tools for enhancing student motivation and learning engagement in response to growing interest in AI-supported instruction. Using an explanatory sequential mixed methods design, quantitative data were collected from 98 instructors across three universities in Lampung Province, followed by qualitative interviews with 15 purposively selected participants. Survey measures assessed perceived usefulness, ease of use, motivational impact, engagement impact, and ethical concerns. Quantitative results showed strong perceived motivational benefits of AI and moderate engagement effects, with significant correlations between usefulness and motivation (p < .001) and disciplinary differences in engagement perceptions (p = .019). Qualitative thematic analysis revealed that teachers observed increased confidence and task persistence among students using AI tools but noted uneven engagement linked to digital readiness and expressed concerns about privacy, shallow reasoning, and academic integrity. Integrated findings indicated that while AI is viewed as a supportive motivational resource, its pedagogical value depends on ethical safeguards and student competencies. The study contributes insights into how teachers interpret AI’s educational role, highlighting implications for institutional policy, professional development, and future AI-enhanced learning designs.
Downloads
References
Alam, A., & Mohanty, A. (2024). Framework of Self-Regulated Cognitive Engagement ( FSRCE ) for sustainable pedagogy : a model that integrates SRL and cognitive engagement for holistic development of students sustainable pedagogy : a model that integrates SRL and cognitive. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2363157
Billingsley, B., Clarke, S., & Selker, T. (2025). EI Search: How to Search for Knowledge in the Age of Generative AI. Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-025-00687-4
Chang, S., Yao, K., Chen, Y., Chung, C., & Huang, W. (2025). Integrating Motivation Theory into the AIED Curriculum for Technical Education : Examining the Impact on Learning Outcomes and the Moderating Role of Computer Self-Efficacy. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16010050
El Fathi, T., Saad, A., Larhzil, H., Lamri, D., & Al Ibrahmi, E. M. (2025). Integrating generative AI into STEM education: enhancing conceptual understanding, addressing misconceptions, and assessing student acceptance. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-025-00125-z
Guan, L., Lee, J. C. K., Zhang, Y., & Gu, M. M. (2025). Investigating the tripartite interaction among teachers, students, and generative AI in EFL education: A mixed-methods study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100384
Hidayat-ur-rehman, I. (2025). Examining AI competence , chatbot use and perceived autonomy as drivers of students ’ engagement in informal digital learning. 17(2), 196–212. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-05-2024-0136
Kim, J. J. H., Soh, J., Kadkol, S., Solomon, I., Yeh, H., Srivatsa, A. V., Nahass, G. R., Choi, J. Y., Lee, S., Nyugen, T., & Ajilore, O. (2025). AI Anxiety: a comprehensive analysis of psychological factors and interventions. AI and Ethics, 5(4), 3993–4009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00686-9
Kitsantas, A., Bembenutty, H., & Cleary, T. J. (2025). Barry J . Zimmerman ’ s Enduring Legacy : The Inspiring Fusion of Self ‑ Regulated Learning Theory , Practice , and Mentorship. Educational Psychology Review, 37(3), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10052-0
Leon, C., Lipuma, J., Oviedo-torres, X., & Pastiu, C. A. (2025). Artificial intelligence in STEM education : a transdisciplinary framework for engagement and innovation. July, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1619888
Mustafa, M. Y., Tlili, A., Lampropoulos, G., Huang, R., Jandrić, P., Zhao, J., Salha, S., Xu, L., Panda, S., Kinshuk, López-Pernas, S., & Saqr, M. (2024). A systematic review of literature reviews on artificial intelligence in education (AIED): a roadmap to a future research agenda. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00350-5
Naseer, F. (2025). Mitigating Conceptual Learning Gaps in Mixed-Ability Classrooms : A Learning Analytics-Based Evaluation of AI-Driven Adaptive Feedback for Struggling Learners. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15084473
Ozturk, M., Wigelsworth, M., & Bagnall, C. (2025). Conceptualising teacher wellbeing: A qualitative investigation with primary school teachers in England. Teaching and Teacher Education, 159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.104989
Papakostas, C. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Religious Education: Ethical, Pedagogical, and Theological Perspectives. Religions, 16(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16050563
Peng, J., & Li, Y. (2025). Frontiers of Artificial Intelligence for Personalized Learning in Higher Education : A Systematic Review of Leading Articles. 1–31. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810096
Pikhart, M., & Al-Obaydi, L. H. (2025). Reporting the potential risk of using AI in higher Education: Subjective perspectives of educators. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100693
Prameka, A. S., Kurniawan, D. T., Suwanan, A. F., Rakhmad, A. A. N., & Firmansyah, R. (2024). Evaluating the Intention for the Student’s Adoption of Artificial Intelligence for Learning Activities in Education-Based University. 9th International STEM Education Conference, ISTEM-Ed 2024 - Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1109/iSTEM-Ed62750.2024.10663097
Satria, F., & Saputra, R. H. (2025). Analysis of Student Perceptions of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Learning in the Digital Age. Raden Intan: Proceedings on Family and Humanity, 2(1), 299–308. https://doi.org/10.47352/3032-503x.80
Shalaby, A. (2024). Classification for the digital and cognitive AI hazards: urgent call to establish automated safe standard for protecting young human minds. Digital Economy and Sustainable Development, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44265-024-00042-5
Velander, J., Taiye, M. A., Otero, N., & Milrad, M. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in K-12 Education: eliciting and reflecting on Swedish teachers’ understanding of AI and its implications for teaching & learning. Education and Information Technologies, 29(4), 4085–4105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11990-4
Yang, H., & Rui, Y. (2025). Transforming EFL students’ engagement: How AI-enhanced environments bridge emotional health challenges like depression and anxiety. Acta Psychologica, 257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105104
Yang, J., & Lou, K. (2024). Psychological determinants and technology acceptance in mobile learning for overseas students studying Chinese in China: A self-determination theory perspective. Learning and Motivation, 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2024.101986
Yaseen, H., Mohammad, A. S., Ashal, N., Abusaimeh, H., Ali, A., & Sharabati, A. A. A. (2025). The Impact of Adaptive Learning Technologies, Personalized Feedback, and Interactive AI Tools on Student Engagement: The Moderating Role of Digital Literacy. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031133
Yin, L., & Fathi, J. (2025). Exploring the motivational dynamics of chinese learners on tandem and hellotalk: A self-determination theory perspective. Learning and Motivation, 90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102113
Zhao, J., Li, S., & Zhang, J. (2025). Understanding Teachers ’ Adoption of AI Technologies : An Empirical Study from Chinese Middle Schools. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13040302
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hermanto Hermanto, Mukarramah Mustari, Athiyyah Sepriani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
